🔗 Share this article

Loved ones of people laid to rest in resting places at risk from shoreline retreat argue that a lack of decision over how to address the issue is causing them avoidable anguish concerning the final resting places of their departed family.

A Looming Threat to Historic Churchyards

Local authorities have singled out three burial grounds in the communities of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the next few generations.

A recent report on the issue details a range of possible actions, from doing nothing to exhuming remains and reburying them in safer locations. Authorities say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it isn’t going to be because of the sea.”

Estimates suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the waves in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s happened in the last 30 years,” one said.

Troubled by the Past

A local business owner remembered a childhood visit to the nearby village of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the water, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing looking for treasures. That is completely disrespectful.”

“I fear that the same thing that happened at Eccles will happen at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the beach. I’d be appalled by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while working overseas. His mother said she could not sleep after discovering her son’s grave might one day be relocated.

“It truly disturb me to consider this may not remain his lasting home,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Seeking Answers and Clarity

The lack of consensus over the timing and method to handle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some are calling for additional coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to proceed for now. Different voices argue the moment for moving graves is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is down to them to choose the direction to take. Our role is here to help support them through that process with residents.”

It was also stated there was time to weigh all the options. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“Currently, there exists no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good local conversations to discover the appropriate solutions for each community.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sorrow for the local community,” but church representatives also spoke of a belief in life after death, offering a theological viewpoint on the temporal loss of sacred ground.