US Men's Grand Slam Dry Spell Isn't Fritz's Responsibility to Bear
I have a few thoughts regarding that remarks made by ESPN commentator a well-known announcer following Novak Djokovic's win over the American player in the US Open quarter-finals. Look – Fritz is the United States, the commentator is from the US – and athletic competitions frequently lend themselves to nationalism. Some disappointment was understandable. Rather, he brought up the ongoing absence of US male players at grand slam tournaments: not one of them had lifted a title since Andy Roddick in 2003, and Fritz had been the last one standing in the tournament.
Everyone love a narrative, myself included. But come on. Suppose the American had beaten Djokovic for the initial occasion, phenomenal talent Carlos Alcaraz was waiting in the following match, who he has never defeated in an official match. And had he somehow survived that, it would have been defending champion Jannik Sinner, versus him the American had dropped 10 of the last 11 sets. Alcaraz and Sinner had also divided the previous seven grand slams (plus Alcaraz went on to defeat a tired Serbian in the next round). Fritz stated in post-match interviews after the loss that he actually liked his path, because it offered the chance to beat the three best players in the sport back-to-back. Fritz is well within his right to aim for the achievement; an athlete is meant to have faith in themselves. But entering that Djokovic last eight match who else sensibly had the lack of American champions in mind?
The American star's weaker delivery the only thing standing in her way and sustained success
The American, twenty-eight, is placed fourth in the global rankings starting the upcoming year-end championships and has secured his last six encounters over third-ranked Alexander Zverev with growing comfort. Presumably he could take that spot for himself in the coming years. But it’s clear that right now, that’s as high as he can climb: The Italian and Spaniard sit a chasm of performance metrics away. Fritz’s top-class delivery and concussive power on each forehand and backhand are sufficiently enough to defeat most rivals on the ATP tour. When facing the handful of generational talents, however, Fritz is frequently overmatched. The past few seasons has witnessed the curious rise of tall, gangly athletes who can nonetheless cover the court with the alarming quickness and fluidity of smaller players. He is six-foot-five and appears that way. His footwork is rigid, as if he’s still getting used to his legs. So he’ll rarely win a rally that the opponent was dictating, and playing a drop shot versus him is typically a safe bet. That acts as a quite severe restriction on his upside.
The American has made a number of dramatic, unexpected improvements over the years. At the beginning of the ten-year period, he was hovering around the lower end of the top 30. 24 months later, he was sniffing the top 10. Last year, he unexpectedly exploded to fourth place – and held the position. But the subsequent step, competing against and defeating legendary figures like the young Spaniard, Sinner, and including a aging Djokovic, is the toughest of all. What could the commentator have been thinking? That the American, in 2025, was a serious threat to beat them all back-to-back? That it was worth mentioning the continuing drought of US male players winning major titles when he had departed the New York major in the quarter-finals? The thirst is just too much and the appreciation for the magnitude of the challenge insufficient.
Taylor Fritz achieved a personal best advancement to the All England Club semi-finals in the summer.
The American's play in that exact last eight match ought to have been enough of an sign. The Serbian triumphed in four sets, a victory that only felt uncertain for brief periods towards the conclusion, when Fritz had survived a couple match points and had a opportunity to maintain serve for 5-5. The duo appeared evenly matched during the exchanges, with Fritz earning numerous chances to win the opponent's serve. But the champion saved break point after service break opportunity, prolonging the run to the point of agony. When he eventually did convert one of the opportunities at 5-5 in the second set, he immediately played a terrible game to lose his own serve again; Djokovic had drawn him into a skirmish secondary to the real battle and compelled him to expend far too much energy to prevail. Facing match points in the final game, Fritz’s first serve sailed to the sky. He prolonged the contest twice on his backup delivery, but finally committed two errors. It was not a choke, in my opinion, only a consequence of having to hit too many weaker deliveries.
The match was fairly compelling proof that the American is not good enough to defeat any form of the Serbian, who was defeated by the Spaniard in the following match and never especially appeared like he thought he could triumph. This is perfectly fine – the Serbian is the best player ever, and might not be at the peak of his physical powers anymore, but has acquired sufficient knowledge and tactical know-how to compensate for a significant portion of the drop-off. The issue is those who were anticipating the American to win, and pressuring him to do so, when he was yet to done anything that suggested he could.
Fritz is an asset to the tour nonetheless. He’s a calm, reflective presence in press conferences, more so than virtually everyone on the men's tour except for the Russian star, prepared to not only say how he feels or the tactic he believed decided a match, but explain it. That he ought to bear the brunt of the blame for the United States failing to produce a men's grand slam winner since Andy Roddick seems unjust. (Now that the fellow American is competing alongside him in the standings, maybe they can share that burden.)
ATP Finals: Player Divisions
Jimmy Connors Group
- Carlos Alcaraz (Sp)
- Taylor Fritz (US)
- Alex de Minaur (Aus)
- The Italian stylist
Bjorn Borg Division
- Jannik Sinner (It)
- Alexander Zverev (Ger)
- Ben Shelton (US)
- The Canadian talent
“I would likely think about it forever if I fail to do it,” the American told an interviewer in June of claiming a major. I hope he realizes that he’s not a failure if he doesn’t achieve that objective, that overcoming Alcaraz and Sinner’s dominant, formidable empire is in fact extremely improbable for all other players. {